I think this is a matter of semantics, at the end of the day, but I don't think there's any more dispute that James is the most best player in NBA history.
I'll add that, while some players may have dominated their respective eras moreso than James has his (like Michael Jordan, obviously, with six rings in eight years), none would dominate THIS era moreso than James has.
This is entirely subjective. No wrong answers. I'd love to have a discussion!
AK
I'll add that, while some players may have dominated their respective eras moreso than James has his (like Michael Jordan, obviously, with six rings in eight years), none would dominate THIS era moreso than James has.
This is entirely subjective. No wrong answers. I'd love to have a discussion!
AK
I think the refs are protecting James just as much if not more than they Jordan.
I'm of a different generation, older.... much older, so I'm going to have to go with Wilt. He lacks the rings that Jordan and James have but his numbers will never be matched.
I'm of a different generation, older.... much older, so I'm going to have to go with Wilt. He lacks the rings that Jordan and James have but his numbers will never be matched.
Yeah, Wilt is another one who, statistically annihilated everybody. You could make cases for all three guys, really. All the three are the best at something, depending on how exactly you look at it.